![]() To review developed websites, currently people take screenshots, highlight design issues and share them with developers using word documents or PowerPoints. You do the math.Ruttl is the fastest website feedback tool that allows users to leave comments directly on live website and make real time edits so they can give precise change values to the developers. Lastly you have like 10 seconds before a user clicks away of boredom or another tab blasting audio and they forget they were on your site. Aesthetics are hard to get right without a lot of work. ![]() Responsive design is very challenging to do limiting your audience by screen sizes. Some users will hate you for the giant javascript library to read your marketing content. It is very light weight and fast, only takes a few ms to deliver a web page to a user. HandleURL does just that, and also gives you great SEO flexibility and whatever CSS based responsive design you like as well as full aesthetic design freedom, without loading any javascript library or app at all. There is absolutely no need to give each web site visitor a full Xojo web session and have them load the whole Xojo javascript library etc, all you need to do is to spit out some dynamic html or a file. The trick to avoid all the issues Phillip mention is to use handleURL for the public Website front end. So, depending on your needs and aim, don´t count out Xojo web as a valid solution. So far it has been great, running standalone on a Raspberry Pi 3. ![]() I started working on this Xojo web CMS project a while back to make my life easier for some internal projects Īfter a while I realised that it actually worked much better than I expected so I decided to take it live on a few public web sites to test it out further. If you use the Xojo web interface to build the CMS backend interface and use the handleURL to feed out the front end web site you can actually scale things up very well and use any responsive CSS, HTML5 or Javascript you like to flash up the front end. Xojo web can indeed create Websites as well as WebApps, or both. ![]() Xojo web is actually very capable of performing the type of task you are describing.ĭepending how you choose to use it it can actually perform very well as a “classic” web server with CMS backend. Hey, this is the Xojo forum so someone has to cheer for Xojo, right? Give it a try and think of all the Xojo code you can write in the time you save! Its all about the content - great pictures, sharp graphics, snappy words. If you want to see some examples we have built in it you can look at:Ī great site is rarely about the technology you use to build it any more than a book is great because of the typewriter you use to write it. We have built about 10 sites in it now and every time I think of how we used to do it I just laugh! It also does mobile responsive very well. It is template driven but don’t judge it by that, you have complete control over what you place on the screen and where. Its costs less than most hosting alone, it has apps for updating your news or blog and even an analytics app. Honestly, having written hundreds of client websites for the past 20 years, B2B, B2C, using everything from HTML to PHP, FileMaker, Flash, CDML, I can honestly recommend … Squarespace! Is there any specific reason not to use Xojo? Does anyone have a recommendation on a website design app or service that they like?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |